Technology & Marketing Law Blog

AUGUST 16, 2024

Copyright Copyright Basics (Copyright Office Circular 1) Note About Fair Use Cartoon Network v. 512 [[link] Primer on Contributory and Vicarious Copyright Infringement Overview of Section 512(c) UMG v. Privacy Review: 16 C.F.R. Spam Review: CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 [[link] and 16 C.F.R.

Editing 101

Editing Law Social Media Contracts 101

43(B)log

DECEMBER 20, 2022

Plaintiffs also alleged infringement of Monbo’s right of publicity, unjust enrichment, and violations of the Lanham Act and related Maryland trademark law. Plaintiffs claimed infringement, including “the character Pug, clips, the title card, concepts, feel, mood, theme, and approach.” So too with plaintiffs’ 2003 Documentary.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Trademark Copyright Editing 52

43(B)log

AUGUST 8, 2024

Prince finds fairness in many images when Prince didn’t care about other artists; Graham v. Prince rejects fair use when his stated intent was to have fun. Sexual pleasure: when mark is used to “titillate” or convey a message that sex is good, that doesn’t establish parody or commentary. Disdain as paradigmatic fair use.

IP 59

IP Fair Use Privacy Licensing 59

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JANUARY 27, 2022

Apple positions itself as more privacy-supportive than the other tech giants, but then it committed an unforgiveable privacy faux pas by unveiling plans to proactively scan client-side files for illegal CSAM. The first Supreme Court ruling on fair use in over a quarter-century, and it’s a good one. Emerging Tech.

Social Media 129

Social Media Law Privacy Government 129