2003 Contracts Litigation Ownership 
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
MAY 2, 2022
The court remains skeptical of LinkedIn’s privacy-based arguments: LinkedIn has no protected property interest in the data contributed by its users, as the users retain ownership over their profiles. Five years into this litigation, let’s take stock of all of the things we still don’t know: Is hiQ still an operational business?
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
OCTOBER 19, 2021
As a result, the legal issues rarely are litigated any more. * * *. Underlying this litigation is an epistemological question: what does a “canonical” version of a web page look like? Citing a 2003 Ninth Circuit case, Kremen v. .” Implied-in-Law Contract/Unjust Enrichment. It didn’t.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Patently-O
FEBRUARY 22, 2023
Stroud is General Counsel at Unified Patents – an organization often adverse to litigation-funded entities. [1] litigation finance boom of the past 20 years—as has been widely reported, private equity now undergirds huge swaths of U.S. Guest post by Jonathan Stroud. Patent assertion finance today is a multibillion-dollar business. [2]
43(B)log
AUGUST 5, 2021
Was more heavily used 1999-2003. Mark McKenna: Another explanation was maybe these bespoke regimes weren’t addressing actual problems; overrepresentation of people w/specific litigation interests. Ownership is of linguistic description of structural properties of invention. Independent creation is likewise justified.
Copyright Lately
JANUARY 16, 2022
Crabtree claims that Kirkman talked him into giving up co-ownership rights in “Invincible” by asking him to sign a document in 2005 that Kirkman represented would make it easier to market the work to licensees but which wouldn’t affect any of Crabtree’s rights. The Requirements for Copyright Joint Authorship and Co-Ownership.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
FEBRUARY 13, 2023
If not, the court may have to address several other interesting, rarely-litigated issues concerning the proper scope of copyright in recorded interviews. Third, is Trump’s claim of ownership barred by 17 U.S.C. After negotiations between them fell apart, both parties sued, each claiming exclusive ownership of the movie footage.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
112 
Let's personalize your content