Remove 2003 Remove Contracts Remove Designs Remove Marketing
article thumbnail

YouTube Isn’t Liable for User Uploads of Animal Abuse Videos–Lady Freethinker v. YouTube

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Thus, Lady Freethinker sued YouTube for breach of contract and related claims. (A AOL from 2003, a case I still include in my Internet Law casebook. Indeed, the court agrees that “section 230 does not necessarily provide immunity for all contract-based causes of action.” ” [Discussing Cross v. .”

article thumbnail

E-Contract India’s present legal framework and next steps

IP and Legal Filings

The COVID-19 pandemic has also acted as an impetus and accelerated the growth of the digital market. Electronic contracts, or “E-contracts,” in the present economy became ubiquitous due to the rapid development of the internet. Meaning Of An E-Contract. E-contract forms a significant part of E-commerce.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Inventors, Physicists and Entrepreneurs: Commerce Home to Diverse-Range of AANHPI Pioneers

U.S. Department of Commerce

MBDA Export Centers help minority-owned enterprises (MBEs) succeed as exporters and has assisted hundreds of MBEs grow their business by gaining access to new international markets, trade financing, and export contracts. Alice Min Soo Chun is the CEO and Founder of Solight Design and SEEUS95 Inc. The mission of the U.S.

article thumbnail

Once Again, LinkedIn Can’t Use CFAA To Stop Unwanted Scraping–hiQ v. LinkedIn

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

They may look to state hacking laws, trespass to chattel claims, or other causes of action “such as copyright infringement, misappropriation, unjust enrichment, conversion, breach of contract, or breach of privacy.”. __. It’s sooooooo 2003. LinkedIn appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.

article thumbnail

If “Trespass to Chattels” Isn’t Limited to “Chattels,” Anarchy Ensues–Best Carpet Values v. Google

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

It’s not possible to “trespass” an intangible asset; any legal protection for the asset comes from contract law (but the plaintiffs gave a license) or IP law, such as copyright law, which the plaintiffs aren’t invoking. Citing a 2003 Ninth Circuit case, Kremen v. .” It didn’t. First Amendment.

article thumbnail

IPSC Panel 9 – Crosscutting IP

43(B)log

Standard debate assumes semi omniscience of designer neutrally concerned with social welfare. Bespoke systems are often underutilized by their own designers and outmoded. Examples: Vessel Hull Design Protection Act. Was more heavily used 1999-2003. What if rules are largely written by the regulated parties?

IP 44
article thumbnail

Court trims claims against for-profit "charity" sweepstakes site that keeps 85% of "donations"

43(B)log

“After learning that Omaze retained up to 85% of the donated funds, Plaintiffs filed this suit alleging that Omaze’s marketing is deceptive and violates California law.” It contracts with Charities Aid Foundation of America, which in turn delivers donated funds to designated charities. Omaze now buys its own swag for contests.