The TTABlog

AUGUST 2, 2021

The Board found that Shen knew he was not the owner of the mark, that his false statement of ownership was material to the registration, and that he intended to deceive the USPTO. The false statement of ownership was a material misrepresentation because an application filed by someone who is not the owner is void. Cancellation No.

Registration 52

Registration Ownership Licensing Trademark 52

SpicyIP

MAY 23, 2022

Jithendra Prasad Singh v State of Assam, 2002. Without the registration requirement, there is no need of any documentation to even claim ownership, before pointing at someone else for alleged infringement and opening them up to arrest. Here are the decisions where various High Courts have taken conflicting views: . High Court.

Copyright 137

Copyright Ownership Copyright Infringement Law 137

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 25, 2024

As a further example, the Court highlighted Tommy Hilfiger Licensing, Inc. ” [11] Applying these principles, the Jack Daniel’s Court held that because VIP alleged ownership over the use of its dog toy’s trademark and trade dress, VIP was using them to identify product source. .” AJ Press, LLC, 52 F.4th

Trademark 40

Trademark Designs Design Branding 40

SpicyIP

JULY 29, 2021

The question of copyrightability of fonts first came up for judicial consideration in 2002, before the Copyright Board in Re Anand Expanded Italics wherein the Board held that fonts are not copyrightable. Some of the reasons put forth by the Board in support of this decision has found support outside of this order as well.

Copyright 126

Copyright Artistic Work Copyright Law Fair Use 126

43(B)log

AUGUST 4, 2023

Partly in response to NJ’s 2002 law—once there’s a smart gun, manufacturers have to switch to it w/in 30 months, though NJ backed off and just required retailers to stock it, but still infuriated gun rights advocates who boycotted Colt and Smith & Wesson who then got out of the market entirely. Super-narrow © license.

Copyright 52

Copyright Fair Use Marketing Marketing 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

MAY 2, 2022

The court remains skeptical of LinkedIn’s privacy-based arguments: LinkedIn has no protected property interest in the data contributed by its users, as the users retain ownership over their profiles. case in 2002 to the Points Guy case in 2022. Eric’s Comments. Verio, Inc.

Cease and Desist 111

Cease and Desist Contracts Privacy Business 111

IP and Legal Filings

AUGUST 14, 2023

2] [image Sources: Shutterstock] When it comes to disagreements over IPR that occur across international borders, this type of dispute is treated the same way as contractual disagreements over the transfer and licensing of these rights are treated: as a tort that falls under general jurisdictional guidelines. [3]

Copyright Infringement 52

Copyright Infringement Law Copyright Intellectual Property 52

IPilogue

JANUARY 14, 2022

Copyright Ownership of Movies and Films in Canada: Who’s on First? The Supreme Court of Canada last considered the definition of “inventor” in 2002, but has yet to consider whether it would include non-human entities. Giuseppina D’Agostino. IP Innovation Clinic ChatBot Launch Event by Bonnie Hassanzadeh. By Meena Alnajar.

IP 106

IP Copyright Infringement Inventor Intellectual Property 106

IIPRD

FEBRUARY 23, 2021

Instances of companies using IP as collateral during times of distress are as follows: Xerox pledged its Patents as collateral due to problems faced concerning financial fraud and certain distress in 2002. The agreement lays down conditions for patent ownership in the event of default. Case Studies. bn USD by Nokia.

IP 40

IP Intellectual Property Branding Brands 40

Kluwer Copyright Blog

AUGUST 7, 2023

In 1984, Condé Nast, the publisher, obtained a license from Goldsmith to allow Andy Warhol to use her Prince portrait as the foundation for a single serigraphy to be featured in Vanity Fair magazine. In 2016, Condé Nast acquired a license from the Warhol Foundation to use the Prince Series as illustrations for a new magazine.

Copyright 52

Copyright Derivative Work Fair Use Copyright Law 52

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 30, 2023

[Delhi High Court] On May 23, the Delhi High Court passed an interesting jud gement on the issue of ownership of the copyright in a film screenplay and held that the copyright in the screenplay of the film ‘Nayak’, lay with Satyajit Ray and on his demise, with his son Sandip Ray and the Society for Preservation of Satyajit Ray Archives (SPSRA).

IP 124

IP Copyright Trademark Intellectual Property 124

LexBlog IP

DECEMBER 6, 2021

2002); TMEP §§ 904.07(b) Trademark practitioners should anticipate IP issues involving NFTs to involve ownership, transfer, and assignments. licensed trademark attorney is not necessary for U.S. . §§ 1051 – 1052 , 1127 ; see Herbko Int’l, Inc. Kappa Books, Inc. , 3d 1156, 1162-63 (Fed.

Trademark 52

Trademark Non-Fungible Tokens Registration IP 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

FEBRUARY 13, 2023

Third, is Trump’s claim of ownership barred by 17 U.S.C. Fifth, assuming Trump owns a valid copyright, did he grant an implied license to Woodward to publish transcripts of the interviews and/or the record­ings themselves? The Falwell court was on solid ground in denying relief on the grounds of an implied license.

Copyright 120

Copyright Blogging Publishing Fair Use 120