2002 Licensing Ownership 
Intepat
APRIL 7, 2025
Initially, this exclusion also applied to plants, but The Patents ( Amendment ) Act, 2002, later reversed this restriction. Ethical Concerns: Patenting medical procedures raises fundamental ethical questions about the ownership of medical knowledge and the extent to which commercial interests should influence medical practice.
LexBlog IP
MARCH 28, 2022
Trade mark ownership is an important consideration for any business. Unfortunately however, while seemingly obvious, the concept of ownership is sometimes overlooked and can be more complex than originally imagined. At this point, it may be too late! Let’s start with the legislation – a very good place to start.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
IPilogue
JANUARY 30, 2023
Famous for its easily-recognizable design of breathable and water-friendly clogs, Crocs was founded in 2002 in the US by three college friends who enjoyed sailing. Crocs Canada is a licensed distributor of the US company, and Double Diamond Distribution Ltd is a direct competitor for clog-style footwear operating under Dawgs and Canada Dawgs.
Patently-O
MAY 2, 2022
The proposal expressly stated that “ownership and title to the Equipment” would be conveyed. 2002) (offer to make a “remote database object. Software License : One question I have in this case involves the onboard software. ” An offer to license is distinct from an offer to sell. .”
SpicyIP
MAY 23, 2022
Jithendra Prasad Singh v State of Assam, 2002. Without the registration requirement, there is no need of any documentation to even claim ownership, before pointing at someone else for alleged infringement and opening them up to arrest. Here are the decisions where various High Courts have taken conflicting views: . High Court.
SpicyIP
MARCH 9, 2025
PPL, claiming ownership over public performance rights via assignments from music labels, alleged infringement after its representatives discovered unlicensed use of its repertoire. The plaintiff submitted that it was the owner of the mark and later by assignment and then by seeking a license it is now a permitted user of the mark.
SpicyIP
JULY 29, 2021
The question of copyrightability of fonts first came up for judicial consideration in 2002, before the Copyright Board in Re Anand Expanded Italics wherein the Board held that fonts are not copyrightable. Some of the reasons put forth by the Board in support of this decision has found support outside of this order as well.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content