Remove 2002 Remove Inventor Remove Ownership
article thumbnail

Innovating the Term ‘Inventor’: AI and Patent Law

IPilogue

Under patent law, it is the general expectation that inventors are humans, not robots. Dr. Stephen Thaler created DABUS (‘Device for the Autonomous Bootstrapping of Unified Sentience’), an artificial neural system, and claimed that DABUS was the sole inventor of the patentable invention. 2002 SCC 77 (“Apotex”).

Inventor 105
article thumbnail

PATENTING MEDICAL PROCEDURES: A GLOBAL DILEMMA

Intepat

This system benefits both society and the inventor. The inventor gains the advantage of excluding others from utilizing the invention for a period of 20 years, while the public benefits from the eventual accessibility of the invention once the patent expires.

Patent 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Australia’s Reversal of its DABUS decision on AI-Generated Inventions: How Does this Impact an Imminent Canadian Discussion on AI Inventorship?

IPilogue

Reversing what seemed like a victory for supporters of AI-owned intellectual property, the full bench of the Federal Court of Australia has confirmed the majority view of the world: only human inventors can own patent rights to their creations. Previously, IPilogue reported that Australia has granted patent ownership to an AI inventor.

Invention 110
article thumbnail

On Sale Bar – Sales require Consideration, not necessarily Money Payment

Patently-O

2022) focuses on the classic patent law question of whether the inventor’s pre-filing sales activity serve to bar the patent from issuing. The Facts : On February 7, 2000 , the inventor’s company (MCE) offered to sell and install a butane-blending system to Equilon. 2002) (offer to make a “remote database object.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (April 7 – April 13)

SpicyIP

A local commissioner inventorized 640 infringing shoe pairs from the defendants premises. The plaintiff claimed copyright ownership in medical study material under the mark “TARGET MDS” based on agreements with defendants 2 and 3, who were authors.

article thumbnail

2021 IP Year in Review

IPilogue

Copyright Ownership of Movies and Films in Canada: Who’s on First? Continued Debates over AI as an Inventor. Around the world, patent registrars grappled with patent applications that credit artificial intelligence software as the inventor. Giuseppina D’Agostino. IP Innovation Clinic ChatBot Launch Event by Bonnie Hassanzadeh.

IP 105
article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2024

SpicyIP

The Rules supersede the Biological Diversity Rules, 2004, and have been created supplementing the 2023 amendment to the Biological Diversity Act, 2002. The notice has cited the recent amendments to the Biological Diversity Act, 2002 and Biological Diversity Rules, 2004 as the reason to revise the 2014 guidelines.

IP 105