IPilogue

SEPTEMBER 3, 2021

2002 SCC 77 (“Apotex”). It can be further argued that Apotex did not focus on the issue of defining the term “inventor”, and the Supreme Court never considered or debated the possibility of AI inventing patentable inventions in 2002. But, it does not define the term “inventor” or specify whether an inventor must be human.

Inventor 105

Inventor Patent Law Law Patent 105

LexBlog IP

DECEMBER 28, 2021

data privacy : what businesses NEED TO know. Keeping pace with the state of data privacy and data privacy regulations is becoming a pressing responsibility for businesses in the digital age. Data privacy legislation is on the rise, with jurisdictions adopting stricter protective measures on a national and global front.

Privacy 52

Privacy Government Intellectual Property Business 52

IP and Legal Filings

MAY 17, 2024

There are no separate legal provisions for these rights and they have been included under the existing Intellectual Property laws. With the advent of technology, the laws governing Intellectual Property Rights also need to pick up pace and change with the changing times. 893 of 2002 (Del) (India). [2]

Personality Rights 97

Personality Rights Intellectual Property Social Media Intellectual Property Law 97

Intepat

MAY 16, 2023

Publicity Rights Under Indian IP Law In India, there is no direct statute that governs publicity rights in the intellectual property law regime. However, Indian law has indirect references for the protection of publicity rights.

Brands 98

Brands Branding Branding Personality Rights 98

SpicyIP

FEBRUARY 24, 2023

Hiranya is a fourth-year law student at the School of Law, Bennett University. Her areas of interest are Intellectual Property Laws, Data Privacy Laws and Company Law.] [This post has been co-authored with SpicyIP Intern Hiranya Bhandarkar. Image from here.

Registration 75

Registration Intellectual Property Law Trademark Brands 75