This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Recently, AI technology once again exceeded the legal community’s expectations by filing a patent for its invention of interlocking food containers. Under patentlaw, it is the general expectation that inventors are humans, not robots. Europe, Australia, and South Africa, only Australia and South Africa granted this patent.
Introduction If we take a broader look at the IntellectualPropertyLaws, the primary objective of the legislation in framing these laws is to provide exclusive rights to the IP right holder as against the entire world.
Thaler’s application for his AI, DABUS, to be the patent owner of an invention titled “ Food container and devices and methods for attracting enhanced attention ,” a product solely created by DABUS without any human interference. Based on current trends, Canada could become the first Western nation to grant patent rights to AI.
In 2002, the Federal Trade Commission, after an extensive inquiry, found out that over 75% of applications by generic pharmaceutical manufacturers were in some way or other involved in litigation initiated by the original patent holders. India changed its PatentsLaws in 2005 to comply with the TRIPS Agreement.
has written about this in an article that was recently published in the UIC Review of IntellectualPropertyLaw. Here's what Mattias writes: Closing the patent loophole across borders by Mattias Rättzén Extra-territorial Kats It is a legal maxim that patents, like any other intellectualproperty rights, are territorial rights.
Professor Sir Robin Jacob, University College London I first met Margaret Lewellyn at the founding event of the University of Edinburgh’s Shepherd and Wedderburn Centre for Research in IntellectualProperty and Technology, which in 2002 morphed into SCRIPT (Scottish Research Centre for Studies in IntellectualProperty and Technology Law).
.” But our problem often is that the law, or lawyers, frequently use unfamiliar or exotic terms that others claim have no more understood meaning than a reference to a “ vermicious kind ,” and those or other lawyers may overuse a word that they do not seem to actually comprehend. Eset, LLC, a patent case.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content