Remove 2002 Remove Fair Use Remove Social Media
article thumbnail

Chain Reaction: Did the Beastie Boys Sue the Wrong Restaurant?

Copyright Lately

The complaint ( read here ) accuses Chili’s operator Brinker International of using the band’s 1994 hit song “Sabotage” in an unauthorized social media video to promote the restaurant. But is Chili’s the real victim of sabotage here? Novak and Michelin-starred chef Tim Hollingsworth.

article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2023

SpicyIP

CCI , the Delhi High Court held that Chapter XVI of the Patents Act is a complete code in itself and overrides the Competition Act, 2002. Social Media platform Humans of Bombay filed a case against a similar platform- People of India alleging copyright infringement and replication of their business model. CCI and Monsanto v.

IP 124
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Announcing the 2024 Edition of My Internet Law Casebook

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Second, the growing number of plaintiff wins against social media services (even if just overcoming MTDs), such as the addiction and sexual predation cases, are inconsistent with this ruling. But half of the cases come from the 2002-2011 era, though that percentage is shrinking. Social Media People v. CSC (2d Cir.)

Editing 116
article thumbnail

Inside 2 Live Crew’s Latest Legal Battle: Copyright Termination

Copyright Lately

” The Court held that 2 Live Crew’s version qualified as a non-infringing fair use because it was a parody that sufficiently transformed the Orbison original. On March 8, 1994, The New York Times reported 2 Live Crew’s Supreme Court fair use victory. Lil’ Joe Makes a Deal.

Copyright 111
article thumbnail

Eddy Grant Prevails in Copyright Lawsuit Against Trump Campaign

Copyright Lately

Trump’s fair use argument fails as the musician wins a copyright battle over the unlicensed use of “Electric Avenue” in a viral video from the 2020 campaign. Second, he rejected Trump’s fair use defense as a matter of law. The court’s ruling is below.

Fair Use 135