2002 Fair Use Ownership 
SpicyIP
JULY 29, 2021
The question of copyrightability of fonts first came up for judicial consideration in 2002, before the Copyright Board in Re Anand Expanded Italics wherein the Board held that fonts are not copyrightable. Some of the reasons put forth by the Board in support of this decision has found support outside of this order as well.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
AUGUST 7, 2023
In this case, the author of the original work retains ownership of the original, while the author of the derivative work holds rights to the creative additions they have made. In the United States, the Copyright Act outlines the concept of fair use – situations where usage does not require authorization. 01, out/2002, p.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
43(B)log
AUGUST 4, 2023
Partly in response to NJ’s 2002 law—once there’s a smart gun, manufacturers have to switch to it w/in 30 months, though NJ backed off and just required retailers to stock it, but still infuriated gun rights advocates who boycotted Colt and Smith & Wesson who then got out of the market entirely. Canada, Bill C-11 passed.
SpicyIP
DECEMBER 30, 2023
[Delhi High Court] On May 23, the Delhi High Court passed an interesting jud gement on the issue of ownership of the copyright in a film screenplay and held that the copyright in the screenplay of the film ‘Nayak’, lay with Satyajit Ray and on his demise, with his son Sandip Ray and the Society for Preservation of Satyajit Ray Archives (SPSRA).
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
FEBRUARY 13, 2023
Third, is Trump’s claim of ownership barred by 17 U.S.C. Sixth, assuming Woodward published copyrighted material without Trump’s authorization, was he permitted to do so, either as a fair use, or by the First Amendment? Issue 3: Is Trump’s claim of ownership barred by 17 U.S.C. This strikes me as the wrong result.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
126 
Let's personalize your content