This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Against that background, this blog post provides some tentative musings on the impact of text-to-image generators on human artistic creativity by analysing recent US and Canadian copyright registrations for artisticworks. In contrast, the CIPO has arguably adopted a more liberal attitude to computer-generated works.
Technology and copyright law. Copyright laws play a crucial role in protecting creative expressions such as literary works, artisticworks and musical works. Through copyright enforcement, an exclusive right is granted to creators. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act. WIPO Copyright Treaty.
SHOULD LEX LOCI PROTECTIONIS BE APPLIED BLANKETLY TO COPYRIGHTINFRINGEMENT? It has been established that lex loci protectionis is the rule that is applied to all the IPR infringement cases, barring a few exceptions. Today, most of the copyrightinfringement happen through the Internet. Garimella and S. Jolly (eds.)2017)
Case Summaries Abbott Healthcare Private Limited vs Vinsac Pharma on 17 February, 2025 (Delhi High Court) Abbott Healthcare sued two defendants for trademark and copyrightinfringement, claiming they deceptively copied its well-known LIMCEE Vitamin C tablets by selling LIMEECEE with similar packaging. Read the post for more details.
Background The dispute took off in 2022, when Lidl accused Tesco of trade mark and copyrightinfringement coupled together with an alleged claim of passing off. Copyright The Court also established that Lidl’s mark was protected by copyright as an original artisticwork under Section 4 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
3] Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and ArtisticWorks, 1887 ‘The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and ArtisticWorks’, formed on September 9, 1886, is the earliest international treaty on copyrights. [4] 9] “WIPO Copyright Treaty, Dec. Geneva, WIPO, 1984.” [3] 3] Kumar, Nagesh.
These included the presence of both the parties in Delhi markets, the prior copyright and trademark registration and long use of the mark by Lacoste, since 2002 and 1927, and 1983 and 1993 respectively, in India. On these grounds, the Court held that CIPL’s use of the similar logo infringed Lacoste’s trademark rights in India.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content