2001 Marketing Public Domain 
The IPKat
SEPTEMBER 15, 2022
Initially, neither the 1992 Law on Trademarks, Service Marks and Designations of Origin , nor the 1992 Patent Law , had provided that putting patented or trademarked goods onto the market within Russia exhausted IP rights. The picture in the upper middle is by Amin and is licensed under the Cretive Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0
The IPKat
NOVEMBER 14, 2022
a wise cat that care about environment kindly provided in CC0 Public Domain license by Pixhere.com) Having to make a selection among the many topics covered, this GuestKat finds it interesting to note that during the conference the EPO case G2/21 on 'plausibility', was repeatedly discussed from different angles.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
43(B)log
DECEMBER 20, 2022
Plaintiffs also alleged infringement of Monbo’s right of publicity, unjust enrichment, and violations of the Lanham Act and related Maryland trademark law. Plaintiffs also alleged infringement of Monbo’s right of publicity, unjust enrichment, and violations of the Lanham Act and related Maryland trademark law.
IP and Legal Filings
AUGUST 8, 2024
The patentee can use the invention as an essential asset, either by licencing the use of the patent to others in return for the royalties or by selling it off to another person This way it can be a remarkable flow of revenue, mostly for the inventions with huge market value.
SpicyIP
JANUARY 2, 2022
The suit concerned agreements dating back to 2001 between IPRS and ENIL regarding broadcasting music in certain cities. The plaintiff was granted, through an agreement, an exclusive non-transferable, non-assignable license for selling, supplying, and distributing the defendant’s brands in domestic and international markets.
IP and Legal Filings
JUNE 27, 2022
Benefits of protecting industrial designs includes- monetary gains, unique selling propositions, positive image of a company in the market, in case the design so created is not profitable, same can eb sold to a third party. And anyone who violates the provisions of this statute is liable to pay a sum of Rs.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
DECEMBER 13, 2023
2001), the court found that: if the promise [in a contract] amounts only to a promise to refrain from reproducing, performing, distributing or displaying the work, then the contract claim is preempted. Guest Blog Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. In Wrench Ltd. Taco Bell Corp. , 3d 446 (6th Cir.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
133 
Let's personalize your content