Remove 2001 Remove Licensing Remove Privacy Remove Public Domain
article thumbnail

Should Copyright Preemption Moot Anti-Scraping TOS Terms? (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

In that case, Judge Easterbrook wrote, in finding that a “shrinkwrap” license was enforceable against the defendant: But are rights created by contract “equivalent to any of the exclusive rights within the general scope of copyright”? Google changed its privacy policy to collect all “public” data (viz.,

article thumbnail

Time for the 12 O'Clock Boyz to go: court shuts down (c)/TM lawsuit against documentary & feature film about Baltimore bikers

43(B)log

Plaintiffs also alleged infringement of Monbo’s right of publicity, unjust enrichment, and violations of the Lanham Act and related Maryland trademark law. Plaintiffs also alleged infringement of Monbo’s right of publicity, unjust enrichment, and violations of the Lanham Act and related Maryland trademark law.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2021

SpicyIP

This judgment concerned the classification of payments under end-user license agreements (EULA). The suit concerned agreements dating back to 2001 between IPRS and ENIL regarding broadcasting music in certain cities. Engineering Analysis Centre for Excellence Pvt. CIT [Supreme Court].

IP 136
article thumbnail

Article 17 DSM Directive: the Swedish proposal (Part 2)

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Accordingly, the proposed right is intended to incorporate the entire catalogue of copyright exceptions, the Swedish freie Benutzung provision in section 4, uses of unprotected content (for example which are in the public domain) and licensed uses (Ds 2021:30, pp. 2001/02:150, p. More from our authors: Law of Raw Data.