article thumbnail

Media Laws, Rights & Privacy Of Celebrities

IP and Legal Filings

Celebrities have objected to this because it interferes with their personal lives and their right to privacy. Furthermore, the Information Technology Act of 2000 makes it a crime to copy or transfer data from another person’s device without their permission. The Indian Copyright Act of 1957 forbids and punishes acts of piracy.

Privacy 98
article thumbnail

How South Africa Handles Notice and Takedown

Plagiarism Today

The European Union, for example, has a notice-and-takedown system as part of its Electronic Commerce Directive , which was adopted in 2000. India has their own process, implemented through the Information Technology Act of 2000. But while these laws are similar in intent, they are often different in the details of how they work.

Design 246
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Kevin Kruse Cleared of Plagiarism Though Questions Remain

Plagiarism Today

At that time, Kruse was facing allegations that he had committed plagiarism, first in his 2000 dissertation at Cornell University and later in his 2015 book One Nation Under God: How Corporate America Invented Christian America. They have obligations to both student and employee privacy that has to be maintained.

article thumbnail

Legality of Recording Phone Calls in India & Admissibility of Such Evidence Before the Court

IP and Legal Filings

The question of intruding into privacy arises when someone eavesdrops on the conversation of participants of the call. 1] Of course, tapping a person’s phone constitutes a serious invasion of their privacy and violates Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution. [2] Privacy depends on individual decisions dictating a way of life.

Privacy 105
article thumbnail

LimeWire to Return to Sell NFTs

Plagiarism Today

Initially released in May 2000, Limewire was a peer-to-peer file sharing service that found a great deal of success and infamy following the closure of Napster in July 2001. If anything, it just further connects NFTs with piracy and lack of security/privacy.

article thumbnail

The Current State of Cross-Border Data-Transfers

IPilogue

In 2015, Austrian law student and privacy activist, Maximillian Schrems, sued Facebook Ireland for what he alleged to be an unlawful transfer of data from Facebook Ireland to Facebook’s headquarters in the United States. Schrems challenged the Safe Harbour Agreement, which passed the muster of the European Commission (EC) in 2000.

Privacy 105
article thumbnail

The Evolving Liability of Domain Name Registrars: Snapdeal Private Limited v. Godaddycom LLC and Ors.

Selvam & Selvam Blog

As a result, they argued that these defendants should not qualify for the safe harbour protections granted to intermediaries under Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Implementation of an Abuse Policy: DNRs must develop clear abuse policies that enable them to cancel or transfer infringing domain names when necessary.