This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
January 1, 2024, brought numerous hangovers along with an unprecedented amount of media attention to intellectualpropertylaw. Freed from the shackles of copyright, Walt Disney’s iconic rodent was now in the publicdomain and, therefore, available for everyone to copy. But not so fast.
It was also contended by scholars that dilution would go on to replace copyright law as well as conventional trademark protection, since it could create trademark rights in gross by permanently removing fictional characters in the publicdomain. [3] 11] Kristen Knudsen, ‘Tomorrow Never Dies’ (2000) 2 VAND. 813, 825. [3]
In this post, we offer an overview of the project to date, stratified across CREATe’s core research themes : Creative Industries , the PublicDomain , and Competition and Markets. The digital revolution has moved legal questions about copyright, information, and competition law to the regulatory centre of the creative industries.
The Indian Information Technology (IT) Act 2000 legalises electronic records and electronic signatures. This Act also includes the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology’s Information Technology Rule, 2000, which governs reasonable security policies and procedures for sensitive personal data or information.
Call for Papers: NALSAR’s Indian Journal of IntellectualPropertyLaw (IJIPL) Vol. The Court, however, disagreed with the Defendant’s argument holding that there was no information available in the publicdomain for the Plaintiff to reach at the above conclusion regarding relations between the Defendants.
Recently, it has provided such uniform unique code numbers to approximately 2000 emoji which may be described as having an outline shape, with black and white colors along with a brief description regarding the same. Moreover, there are other similar examples that show that emoji itself is not patentable, but that the technology is certain.
student at Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow. She is keenly interested in IntellectualPropertyLaw, Technology Law, and Corporate Law ]. Image from here [ This post is co-authored with Tejaswini Kaushal with inputs from Swaraj and an anonymous reader. Tejaswini is a 3rd-year B.A.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content