2000 Copying Due Diligence 
IP and Legal Filings
JULY 13, 2022
Indian courts, for the longest time, followed the doctrine of “sweat of brow”, upholding the belief that a work requires only due diligence and effort, rather than originality and creativity in order to be granted copyright protection. What is the Indian take on originality v. creativity? Copyright Act or Design Act?
IP and Legal Filings
APRIL 19, 2022
Information Technology Act,2000. The Information Technology Act of 2000 [hereinafter referred to as the “IT Act”] regulates the intermediaries or Internet Service Providers (ISPs) involved. Safe Harbour Principle ( Section 79 of IT Act,2000). The complainant is the sole Copyright owner of the work, according to the details.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
IIPRD
NOVEMBER 14, 2023
There are few e-commerce companies which explicitly make copies of brands such as Firstcopyclub, ShoesKartel etc. Challenges in IPR Regulation in e-commerce As per a survey, around 38% online buyers experienced counterfeit products and 1/3 rd people have gotten copied products. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India).
IIPRD
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
4] SOLUTION IP audit and due diligence can help identify the IP rights and obligations of the parties involved, as well as the potential IP threats and opportunities. 7] Risk of unauthorised disclosure, copying, or use of confidential or proprietary information, trade secrets, or copyrighted material stored in the cloud increases.
IP Intelligence
JUNE 3, 2024
(Warner) to license certain works from the Music Specialist catalog, including “Jam the Box,” which was interpolated into Flo Rida’s hit song “In the Ayer,” which went on to sell millions of copies. accrues’ when an infringing act occurs[,]” regardless of when the plaintiff learns of it. [2] Nealy , 601 U.S. 4] See TRW Inc. Andrews , 534 U.S.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JULY 25, 2022
Under the “discovery rule,” the limitations period begins to run when “the plaintiff discovers, or with due diligence should have discovered, the injury that forms the basis for the claim.” 1994), the plaintiff gave a copy of his screenplay to a film producer in 1985. Petrella , 572 U.S. The Ninth Circuit Precedents. In Roley v.
SpicyIP
MAY 6, 2024
vs Prerna Rajpal Trading As The Amaris Flagship Store on 29 April, 2024 (Delhi High Court) The dispute is over copying substantial elements like placement, pattern, color combination of plaintiff’s Serpenti Ocean Treasure Necklace by the defendant’s Shield-It Necklace. Bulgari S.P.A
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
95 
Let's personalize your content