IP and Legal Filings

FEBRUARY 2, 2023

Due diligence requirements: Online gaming intermediaries are required to comply with all due diligence requirements applicable to intermediaries in general under IT Rules 2021. An intermediary that provides one or more online games is referred to as a “online gaming intermediary.”

Due Diligence 98

Due Diligence Registration Government Technology 98

IP and Legal Filings

APRIL 19, 2022

Information Technology Act,2000. The Information Technology Act of 2000 [hereinafter referred to as the “IT Act”] regulates the intermediaries or Internet Service Providers (ISPs) involved. Safe Harbour Principle ( Section 79 of IT Act,2000).

Copyright Law 94

Copyright Law Copyright Law Copyright Infringement 94

IP and Legal Filings

NOVEMBER 15, 2024

Other legislations include the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Prize Competition Act, 1955. It also introduces a due diligence process under Rule 3 and 4 which the Online Gaming Industry has to comply to. Criminal Laws Various criminal laws like Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, IT Act, 2000, etc.

Advertising 97

Advertising Advertising Law Due Diligence 97

The IPKat

JULY 2, 2022

In 2000, the EU legislature adopted the landmark Ecommerce Directive , which provides – at certain conditions – for limitations of liability of certain information society service providers (ISSPs) as potentially arising out of illegal activities committed by users of their services.

Due Diligence 83

Due Diligence Advertising Advertising Law 83

IP and Legal Filings

OCTOBER 20, 2022

Further, the section also provides that in case a pre-packaged commodity is advertised, then such advertisements shall also declare the net quantity or number of the commodities contained in the package along with the retail price. [1]. The font size of the net quantity in the advertisement shall be same as that of retail sale price.

Advertising 94

Advertising Advertising Due Diligence Government 94

Selvam & Selvam Blog

MARCH 28, 2022

Section 142 of the Act categorizes threats as circulars, advertisements or other similar means served on the other party. However, BigBasket’s threats and allegations are arguably groundless and the recourse against the same would be through Section 142 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

Cease and Desist 40

Cease and Desist Trademark Due Diligence Intellectual Property 40