Remove 2000 Remove Advertising Remove Branding
article thumbnail

Delhi High Court Orders Amazon to Pay Rs. 339 Crore Damages: A Wake-Up Call for E-Commerce Giants on Counterfeit Goods

Selvam & Selvam Blog

This case highlights the intersection of trademark law and e-commerce regulation, raising questions about the accountability of online marketplaces in protecting brand integrity. of facilitating the sale of counterfeit BHPC products, tarnishing the brands image and causing substantial financial loss. and Amazon Seller Services Pvt.

article thumbnail

Copyrightability Of Designer Clothes And Costumes

IP and Legal Filings

The Design Act 2000 -The Designs Act of 2000 was enacted with the intention of safeguarding non-functional parts of a product that have aesthetic appeal, such as the arrangement of shapes, patterns, decorations, or lines or colours applied to any two-, three-, or both-dimensional form. Case Studies Rajesh Masrani v.

Design 105
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Ping® – Arts, Entertainment, Media and Advertising Law News – Protecting Furniture Design Keeps Getting Harder

LexBlog IP

– a leading furniture brand and purveyor of the iconic Eames Chair Design – suffered a loss at US Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) in its bid to protect as “trade dress” the design of the chair. 56 USPQ2d 1279, 1282 (TTAB 2000); In re Parkway Mach. Herman Miller, Inc. In re Ennco Display Sys.

article thumbnail

Can I Use a Competitor’s Name in Advertising?

LexBlog IP

Can I Use a Competitor’s Name in Advertising? by Founders Legal Some of the most memorable advertising campaigns in history involve the comparative use of competing trademarks. 2000 WL 33535712 (C.D. Coke vs. Pepsi; Burger King vs. McDonald’s; Bud Lite vs. Miller Lite. The list could go on and on. America Online Inc.,

article thumbnail

Finding the Real “Burger King”: Identical Marks & Prior Use in the Pune Eatery Case

SpicyIP

While its first registration for the brand name in India (1979) was under Class 16 [Paper & Paper Products] , the trademark was registered w.r.t. On the other hand, Hyderabad-based Magfast Beverages started manufacturing their drink under the name Mountain Dew in 2000. Does the Pune eatery enjoy Prior Use of Burger King?

article thumbnail

Trademarks And the Metaverse

IP and Legal Filings

In an effort to connect with a younger, tech-savvy consumer base, more and more firms are deciding to debut their products and advertise them electronically through the Metaverse. Their rights will be protected thanks to the metaverse brands’ trademarks. It might be more difficult than ever in the metaverse to police brands.

article thumbnail

Advent of AI Voice Generation and Threat to Personality Rights

IP and Legal Filings

A very common way of marketing a product is to have it advertised and endorsed by celebrities that the public holds in good opinion. AI generated voice being used to fraudulently misrepresent or impersonate an individual would fall under the ambit of Section 66D and Section 66E of the IT Act, 2000.